
When I started building websites, I didn’t think much about URL slugs.
Something like:
/page?id=123
or even:
/this-is-a-very-long-url-slug-with-too-many-keywords
seemed fine.
Turns out… it’s not.
After testing multiple pages and tools, I realized that bad slugs quietly hurt both SEO and user experience.
Here’s what actually works 👇
🚫 Common mistakes
Most developers:
- Use dynamic URLs with IDs
- Stuff keywords into slugs
- Make them too long
- Ignore readability
Example:
❌ /best-seo-url-guide-for-beginners-2026
❌ /page?id=928374
❌ /how-to-create-the-best-url-slug-for-seo-ranking-fast
✅ What works better
From what I’ve tested, high-performing slugs usually follow these rules:
- 3–5 words max
- Lowercase only
- Use hyphens (-), not underscores
- Include ONE main keyword
- Remove filler words (like "the", "and", "for")
Example:
✅ /seo-url-guide
✅ /slug-generator
✅ /password-generator
⚡ Why this matters
Short, clean URLs:
- Are easier to read
- Get better click-through rates
- Are easier to share
- Help search engines understand your page
🛠️ What I built
While working on multiple projects, I got tired of manually creating slugs.
So I built a simple tool to generate clean, SEO-friendly slugs instantly.
👉 https://codetooly.com/tools/slug-generator.html
💡 Final takeaway
If you’re ignoring your URL structure, you’re leaving easy SEO wins on the table.
Keep it simple.
Keep it short.
Make it readable.
United States
NORTH AMERICA
Related News
How Braze’s CTO is rethinking engineering for the agentic area
10h ago
Amazon Employees Are 'Tokenmaxxing' Due To Pressure To Use AI Tools
21h ago

Implementing Multicloud Data Sharding with Hexagonal Storage Adapters
15h ago

DeepMind’s CEO Says AGI May Be ~4 Years Away. The Last Three Missing Pieces Are Not What Most People Think.
15h ago

CCSnapshot - A Claude Code Configs Transfer Tool
21h ago
